do not believe in impartiality the news. There are always elements that challenge you to take part. In the telling fact, since the structural and narrative, he writes takes place, even to rank the events. The same event would be published in different ways by whatever means you communicate. Furthermore, very neutral which is the attitude of the presenter, extraverbal communication, however subtle and unintended, in the best-says which side is.
In my view, impartiality is a myth, a lie, from the perspective that all communication has a purpose, is strategic: each press decide how to count things and what to say. The media has a class character. Each medium chooses its editorial policy and therefore the content and how to address their messages. Working in an environment means accepting its conditions editorial: Some do it out of conviction, others for ethical reasons, others for money and status, others because of cultivating the love of his profession. Others have other reasons.
Freedom of the press are relative, prefixed by the media. Each one has its limits and its precepts. Therein lies its concept of freedom. Press freedom is relative, both in official journalism, alternative, "independent" citizen ... From this it follows that each medium has its views, and thus exercise their "freedom" to communicate. Surely if one day I have my own press, have my own concept of freedom.
hyper and in a globalized world like today, everyone (and I say no receiver or mass, because I think the audience is more interactive than these concepts) exercises the freedom to build their "truth" from his critical view After analyzing the messages of the media at its disposal, and noting the reality. I do believe in democracy, media and information and provide equal opportunities for ALL expression in any medium.
Media should be yours, yours, mine, him and her, our, your ... of all. " God Save the King ,"-and the press-"to shut his mouth" or ignore "people."
