Dear Facebook friends, in the days December 31 and January 1 will develop a day of "VIRTUAL PRAYER FOR FREEDOM OF CUBA." Will be to achieve the greatest amount of "states" or "status" on Facebook with a possible sentence of José Angel Febles Chaviano que reza: CONCEDENOS SEÑOR LA LIBERTAD PARA CUBA Y CONCEDENOS LA ENTEREZA NECESARIA, PARA MANTENERLA POR SIEMPRE. ¡AYUDANOS, SEÑOR!
Recabo su ayuda para diseminar la idea.
La intención será inundar la red con este mensaje, que no debe ser removido en esos dos días, ni alterar la integridad del texto. A la vez debe ser posteado en sus Blogs, los que lo tengan. Saludos a todos y gracias por su atención y que el 2010 pueda ser llamado "Año de la Liberación de Cuba”.
But back to the show, we can summarize this year that Lucas did not teach us anything new: - Two galas that could have been a (largely). - Awards extremely boring. Some of the winners were drowned on nonsense that might have been removed and not aired. - Jokes that never worked. The driver Luis Silva is still in its infancy, is still lacking. - Contacts, supposedly live, with another location where the bad taste and vulgarity of Cuba in 2009 did not lack (New Man). - Guest artists performing tracks that expended and little acceptance among the audience. For example: Isis Flores, and David White. - Extremely fatal musical performance of boys in the series "Much Ado." They did not know where they stood. - total unbalance in the distribution of gala presentations between the first and second. The first was a waste of resources for nothing.
But all this is irrelevant because Lucas did its job to send a political message that the direction of the TV waiting for: the living and going "well." Lucas Awards 2009 is history, Lucas 2010 is still in "see." Ojala and mistakes are not repeated, but there are things that can never be eliminated while the project of Cuban Video Clip TV belongs to the Communist Party of Cuba. Introducing Baby
In this video we can see the tribute that gives the singer Omara Portuondo of the member countries of ALBA and part of the closing speech by Raul Castro in which it acknowledges the crimes of this organization.
Libertador Morales, the Just , our dear Efterpis Charalambidis, demonstrates the importance of a screenplay that his Central Character is solidly built around its crucial feature . This fact, perhaps elementary, but quite often neglected, this gives strength to the structure of a script, that any weakness in the progression of external action, digression, momentary loss with respect to the goal of history, etc .- passes into the background. Unlike those who see the essence of the "structure" in the ordering of events in the script (such as Syd Field) Write Method ® underlines the power of the test figure. To Write ®, a story is not only the inventory of a series of cleverly arranged events, but also the result of a feud between the external surrounding an inner character and tested. This race is very clear in Libertador Morales, the Just and so the film does say with clarity that the justice that moves, is that which comes from human sensibility.
Angels & Demons ( The Lost Symbol , Ron Howard, 2009, based on the novel by Dan Brown), provides a clear example of what happens when a script divorced the nature of his alleged central figure in the fact in which it appears involved. Robert Langdon, professor of iconography and symbolism that stars in the story is, as stated on several occasions throughout the film - a hardened atheist. And it seems that the writer (and beyond it, the writer of the original novel) had wanted to establish such status in order to "problematize internally," the character, but this trait, which not is a crucial feature, since it is not tested by the events of the story, the protagonist does not produce any internal conflict, nothing that happens in Angels and Demons Langdon committed atheism. Or in other words, the film fails to build the dramatic situation Langdon placed in the dilemma of choosing between their actions and believe, between his work and his being. What this shows, and for this, structures such as failed Angels and Demons are a school-is that a script can not reach deeper dramatic if you can not ascribe the main character who is deeply in nature in conflict with the circumstance that places the history . This is the core Basic Structure Type and properly structured nucleus appears that in most of the films properly dramatized, both gender, as author, from Star Wars George Lucas of up SEOM of Kim Ki-duk. The crucial feature of the character is a manifestation of nature that tests. Therein lies the secret of a good story dramatized. In this basic concept Write Method ® lies much of its power.
nature and circumstance: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button of David Fincher, is a good example of a script that sacrifices the nature of the cases, and in particular, gives us the opportunity to explain these two concepts central to Type ® method. A play is usually the product of nature has been subjected to a circumstance, ie the product of human nature that have the challenge of transforming their interaction with the social environment (circumstantial) that contains it, or transforming the environment. And that is what, very in style, contains the original story Scott Fitzgerald, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button . In the famous story by American writer, a man (Benjamin Button), suffers amazing fortune of being born into a old man and the unique nature contravenes and dislocates the fate of the first viewer of this wonder: Mr. Roger Button, his unfortunate father. The nature of Benjamin Button is subversive, not only is the Button family who is forced to test their prejudices and ideas of the world, old age and youth, to sustain the paradox that involves both (Lord Button -oscillating between love and denial-make his son an old man / child, dress, education will, it will share in the family fortune, always subject to the demands of that love painful almost unbearable), but also , some individuals from the society of Baltimore in the late nineteenth and early twentieth compare their pre-conceptions of this nature. The result is a story in which anecdote is dramatized in the clash of these two conflicting natures of a man who, against all logic, he lives life backwards and a society that, by nature, judge the life right.
Very different is the strategy of screenwriter Eric Roth in the film of David Fincher: Benjamin is its nothing but circumstance and circumstance. Benjamin was born as a baby to look old and this curious circumstance is a source of entertainment and wonder. As Benjamin only circumstance (and not an essence that oppose problematic to one essence) no conflict or potential conflict: a black couple picks up the character, breeding, and from here, that circumstantial exteriority be an old man who gradually transformed into places the "young hero? in different situations: to live some adventures, falling in love with an older woman while he is younger, until the chain of circumstantial situations come to an end. Since there is essentially no conflict or potential friction: society, live their circumstances on the one hand (his passing) and Benjamin lives turn theirs (also its passing). And when they run out circumstances, the film ends having said anything more than that: that the fact of being born old and dying young is sad or pathetic or in short, that that fact is just a show.
Fitzgerald's account of speech, ironic voice of the paradoxes and ironies of society, time and life. Fincher's film presents just the sight of a strange situation: what in Fitzgerald's narrative pretext, in Fincher is almost unique ceremony. The conclusion is that without the dialectic between nature and circumstance is very little that can be said that the fate of a script built on the mere fact rests on the precarious possibility that a movie can be sustained only show as nothing more than a circumstance.
I am in a strange territory for my case, an artificial jungle (if you want in the best sense of the term). In a country in crisis and a president-elect hopes flying by the way there, but which must still be pretty skeptical, there are many questions that are captured.
Nobody is born outside the four walls you can feel naive to the weird ways, but neither can pedírsenos that lack a minimum of common sense and ability to surprise. In the nebula that is strange USA (sic) I have been faced in conversation with its citizens to understand their own contradictions. Finding myself in a northern state that I take a filter may be partially effective if it is to generate a more or less accurate idea of \u200b\u200bwhat is considered: less mystified impressions of American myth.
This country has generated an intransigent thinking only of himself. People are in their self-awareness and a sense of belonging but also exalted self-recognition and legitimacy. The idea here is not immaterial nation except the State. Pariese remember that the ancient Greek polis, in which its own contradiction was part of the Hellenic, how and how spartan Athenian were inconclusive in the worldview. Here seems to act a similar system: the south and the north remain in a permanent ideological confrontation. If we look at the average American will see that it has common features, printed in their own currency: the quarters. Reaching this point is where I seek not to fall into clichés, since the last century provided a common space in the anti-thinking, in the same way many American tone here boast without a modicum of understanding everything that has qualified the West (where broadest sense). role play is perhaps where each individual has chosen the way of life that is most desirable. Got something to trade if see as a fair where you can take the form that you prefer. But if there is something that seems permanent is the sense of the contradiction but made material values \u200b\u200bpracticed and cultivated. She understand the long-existential doubt unconsciously should develop over the course of history, in compliance with a stated destination. Here you see something that seems to work, a huge machine of different roles to be fulfilled. But I nevertheless remains a question because, although every citizen understands the role that fits you and that is forged ... I worry not recognize in his core point what role is attributed themselves as a group.
Finally the atmosphere seems to be that the contradiction, while the cross that gives meaning to it have not been elucidated.
CONCEDENOS SEÑOR LA LIBERTAD PARA CUBA Y CONCEDENOS LA ENTEREZA NECESARIA, PARA MANTENERLA POR SIEMPRE. 
production could not hide the inexperienced artists present their limited knowledge when to fold songs and presentation on stage. There was not one of the artistic performances of the night where the performances were live. This was supposed to be so in gratitude to the audience, we were wrong. 
