A forgotten aspect How many treatises on the law have done? Perhaps most of which anyone could speculate. Thousands have been the libraries that are filled trying to explain the idea of \u200b\u200bJustice, many philosophers have gone round and round to reach the merits of the case: as Kant pleaded reach that shore which finally addressed his thoughts and inner peace harmony . Following this concept - that of Justice, have developed historical processes of incalculable influence on his contemporaries. Roman law, the Thomistic Doctrine, American Conquest, the French Revolution, have been made of immeasurable extent.
But one wonders after witnessing the extensive literature on this subject, to observe changes in the product world of their own transformation, to quantify all Universities have been founded and instructed in the handling of the Justice, to study the thousands of institutions created in the real history to strengthen its dominance, what then is the injustice? How do you explain? Is it a disease or a mere psychological and social status? Just look at the moral implications that could have the simple fact that modern science discovered certain genes that make us prone or directly aimed at acts that are socially defined as bad, that would be as revolutionary as well as for medicine and biology for the same social science skirt the same determinism of the will.
This test is considered Aquinas the following explanation, "the law say that while a certain rule and measure, is said to be in something in two ways: one, like the one measured and controlled. And since this belongs right in this concept of law is one reason. Otherwise, eat in the regulated and measured. And the law exists in all those inclined to something by any law. " [1] From this perspective occupy the second proposition, which does not exist - according to Thomas Aquinas - the hegemony of reason. Thus there can include any act that is in itself bad, and by the existence of a teleological element or mere inability to observe the duty racional a cumplir. Para esta indagación echaremos reiterados vistazos a dos experiencias en las cuales los sujetos víctimas de la Injusticia fueron cruelmente sometidos a los peores males físicos que un ser humano puede sufrir: la tortura y la muerte. Escudriñaremos paralelamente ambas vivencias e intentaremos una penetración a la fibra misma de la Injusticia. Los ejemplos que se tomarán serán en el proceso judicial contra Tomás Moro [2] , junto con el relato de Victor Frankl acerca de su vida en un campo de concentración Nazi [3] . Si bien el primer ejemplo es más fino en cuanto a los criterios y formas en los procesos jurídicos, el segundo es más testimonial y aun cuando se profundiza more on the psychology of the victim of unjust act bilaterally reveals new insights for the treatment of the subject.
oppressive act of injustice as
If we consider the injustice as the maximum degree of oppression of one person to another, in a simple way not specifically say that strict equality due - or, of the state to the individual - in that scope will say that there is no division of assets and loads in proportion, we turn to observe the ways in which to express [4] . In the case of Thomas More seemed unfair that the act does not review the religious aspects in itself, ie not being tried for heresy, how great and important of which was the best thinker of the era is that it does prevail moral freedom as hypothetical raw - as it was important to keep-up the same point of death. From this perspective it is unfair not covered in any sanctity, for in the same manner as persuaded to recognize Henry VIII as supreme authority in religious matters they could have moved to secure anything. The brave here is the ability not to compromise their own freedom, if not he himself who is restricted or oppressed by situational factors. The freedom to act - or rather to think, in this case is necessarily Moro the transaction is not willing to make. In this sense, the lawyer Jaime Guzmán is right in saying that the autonomy of consciousness is the greatest of freedoms, as in this tiny but vast scene of our thoughts can develop fully each and every one of the ideas they like to attend.
Then, looking at the case of Victor Frankl for his unjust act passed by lines other than the example above. Injustice has borders that are characterized by threatening the very identity and not only him, but all common. Here are no restrictions as to oppress freedom extends to overshadow the very root of man: their customs, their memories, their feelings, psychological structure. Are clarified in this context new intrinsically human rights can be sized just as they are hit, then your thread is fine and in a normal under other rights are overprotected superstructures that are larger than a man can recognize whether conscious or instinctive , or exhaustively defined. The strength of the crosses and Frankl
to social epidermis not only superfluous, its greatness lies in making yourself prevail in the human character of its existence, ie not to be reduced to a state that is not recognized as man and that also recognizes the ongoing harassment of officials of the SS or called in the story "bosses". It is also clear that keeps the idea of \u200b\u200bfreedom at all times, either because they note the oppression of the victim and which is craving a return to her, so shows such as the passage in which he tries to observe his city neighborhoods from the train to take him to a new camp and also is instructive when it comes to their companions who had launched the electrical wiring to commit suicide, it does not judge his actions, not the accused and believed to have been somehow in his own consciousness the grounds that they had to do it. The reason and the fact unfair
German politician says Willy Brandt [5] "allow unfair means opening the way for all to follow." The phrase is very true if the context with the treatment we are doing, since it says that an act of his evil can not be diminished at all, because as an act of justice could be precedent for bigger and better acts of such nature, the least evil can lead to a repetition of events that are inherently unacceptable in total impunity. Are many cases where we lay eyes on it, in the observation of various dictatorships - Nazism, communism, Castro, fascism, Franco-prevail in itself suspicious "Reasons State "and if we reject the political character and relations between individuals we will become even more fierce the motivations, somehow along the genetic, pathological, ideological or social.
The case of Henry VIII and Thomas More, is very striking in two threads are intertwined and are totally different the same rope that will ultimately end with the beheading of which was the former Chancellor of the King. The uniqueness of the case is to identify the reasons of state with monarchist sentiment of the British Crown. It is tragicomic as death is attributed to teachers' whims that could have been perfectly managing the fine line drawn more neatly diplomats by the nobility and all the palace bureaucracy. The question as to those who do not know the infrastructure - in the etymological sense, the power, if this happens or, event causality between the King's personal life and ambitions state is common or not. The consequences of that question are not minor, as if we apply the same standards to the case of Frankl, specifically the government of Hitler, it would be obvious that the whole organization of a centralized state seemed to waver in something so foreign and subconsiderado such as sensitivities the ruling, which ultimately could be the same autoflagelación de aquel sistema.
La barbarie es en sí misma una cuestión de sinrazones, pero esto también quiere decir que la sinrazón es causa de ella. Bajo esta perspectiva es mejor afirmar que la Injusticia se engendra en la misma Injusticia. Para comprobar aquello es útil observar el trasfondo histórico que rodea al campo de concentración en que habita el médico judío protagonista de la historia del “Hombre en Busca de Sentido”. Reconocemos bajo distintos criterios que el genocidio alemán fue una matanza que no tiene justificación alguna, pero cabe señalar que no por eso carece de explicación. A ella confluyen distintos factores sociales e ideológicos, además de implicancias de structural type will form a breeding ground for mass adoctrinante caudillismo dissatisfied. Namely, the injustice in this case no longer enough just to identify two parameters in the same man as in the previous case, but under it - if it was-lives caused a multitude of causes that have drawn a amalgam of blame, confrontation, taboos, resentment and imbalances that have built a society inflexible to settle compelling reasons in favor of passion and of greatly inhibited and repressed. Injustice is and is not out of existence in the light of men, but at least dims and the right not to be a victim of it is worthless. If there an injustice - are thought to have reason to be more lenient or the case is the cost side that should be addressed.
is necessary to refer to the following words, "In fact, in certain circumstances of human existence seems that evil is somewhat useful, as propitious occasion for good" [6] . Could the cause of Justice Injustice? or rather, "Injustice is not the cause of the great Justices? I use the example of World War II, only after it was forged and unified - at least formally-the will to achieve a common declaration to preserve the most essential rights people. Then, it took all the barbarity that came into the eyes and mind of Victor Frankl to model a fearful awareness of the crime of State or even more optimistic, a society mindful of the state machinery with which it faces.
Final Thoughts
Somehow the weakness and strength are only human connotation: in the same sense. Any other statement seems incidental and obscures the merits, but also applied to the singular case, enhanced. The truth is that in situations that seem chaotic and contentious as it is wise not to feel that you have the monopoly on moral and therefore of justice. In conclusion, it appears that the injustice is not seen as a social state or individual unrelated to the circumstances that motivate them, what is clear is that the injustice is in itself the absence of Justice, said flatly, causes no such effect Injustice, but the specific effect of them are the lack of Justice. That's where the problem lies in the road - as we do not stop the process in time, and visibility - even as we realize what happens, "the wrongful act, that as there is injustice prominent motivation, but the reasoning goes against the Justice and are very tolerant of it, because we can not conceive of any way the tragedy of the rapidly growing unjustified behind us and that the only victims as were Thomas Moore and Victor Frankl, eventually ended up being ourselves.
[1] Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologica, Treaty Law in General, Book Club, 1949.
[2] Zinnemann, Fred, "A Man For All Seasons", Columbia Pictures, UK, 1966.
[3] Frankl, Victor, "Man's Search for Meaning" Ed Herder, Spain, 1991.
[4] Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics" Ed Gredos, 2000.
[5] His original name Herbert Ernst Frahm was born in Lübeck in 1913 in a family with deep social convictions. He joined the SPD (German Social Democratic Party) in 1930 and in 1933 fled the Nazi dictatorship to Norway where he adopted the name Willy Brandt. Stripped of German citizenship by the Nazi regime in 1938, worked with resistance and had intercourse with the authors of the plot against Hitler in 1944.
[6] John Paul II, "Memory and Identity" Ed Planeta, Buenos Aires, 2005.
